slogan3

Help me een door de gemeenschap aangedreven voorstel systeem ontwikkelen voor mijn governance token.

description

Door een door de gemeenschap aangedreven voorstel systeem te ontwikkelen, geef je tokenhouders meer macht, vergroot je de betrokkenheid en zorg je dat beslissingen de collectieve belangen van je ecosysteem weerspiegelen.

prompt

try_prompt

Hoe kan ik een voorstel systeem creëren dat leden van de gemeenschap aanmoedigt om governance voorstellen in te dienen en op te stemmen voor mijn token? Token naam: {{token_naam}}. Beschrijf de benodigde functies ... more
generate_helper
disclaimerOnPageApi image_legal_disclaimer...

ai_answers

provider: openai
model: gpt-4.1-nano
Het creëren van een voorstel systeem voor jouw token, VoorbeeldToken, vereist een gestructureerde aanpak met functies die betrokkenheid stimuleren en transparantie waarborgen. Hier zijn de belangrijkste functies en strategieën: Benodigde functies: 1. Voorstelindiening: - Gebruiksvriendelijk formulier voor het indienen van voorstellen. - Validatie- en beoordelingsmechanismen om dubbele of onvolledige voorstellen te voorkomen. - Toewijzing van unieke ID's aan voorstellen voor tracking. 2. Discussie- en commentaarsysteem: - Geïntegreerde discussiekamers of commentaarsecties per voorstel. - Mogelijkheid voor leden om vragen te stellen en feedback te geven. 3. Stemproces: - Officiële stemfunctionaliteit met authenticatie via tokenbezit. - Instellingen voor stemperiode (start- en einddatum). - Verschillende stemtypes (bijvoorbeeld enkelvoudig, meervoudig). - Validatie om te voorkomen dat leden meer stemmen dan toegestaan uitbrengen. 4. Transparantie en rapportage: - Live updates van stemresultaten. - Overzicht van voorgestelde en goedgekeurde voorstellen. - Audit trails en geschiedenis van de voorstellen en stemmen. 5. Beloningsmechanismen: - Incentives zoals badges, token rewards of privileges voor actieve deelnemers. 6. Integratie met governance-token smart contracts: - Automatisering van het stemproces en uitvoering van goedgekeurde voorstellen. Strategieën voor participatie en transparantie: - Educatie en communicatie: - Regelmatige updates via e-mail, sociale media en communityfora. - Duidelijke handleidingen voor het voorstel- en stemproces. - Gamification: - Beloningen en erkenningen voor actieve deelnemers. - Leaderboards of ranglijsten. - Openheid en inclusiviteit: - Open voor alle tokenhouders en mogelijk bredere gemeenschap. - Transparante criteria voor voorstelacceptatie en stemmingen. - Feedback en iteratie: - Regelmatige evaluaties van het systeem en open feedbacksessies. - Verbeteringen op basis van community input. - Gebruik van betrouwbare tools: - Blockchain-gebaseerde stemmen voor onveranderbaarheid. - Decentrale platforms zoals Snapshot voor off-chain stemmen met transparantie. Door deze functies en strategieën te combineren, creëer je een betrokken, transparante en efficiënte governance structuur voor VoorbeeldToken, die communityparticipatie stimuleert en vertrouwen opbouwt.
provider: deepseek
model: deepseek-chat
Of course. Here is a comprehensive guide to creating a proposal and voting system for **ExampleToken**, detailing necessary features, strategies for participation, and ensuring transparency. ### Core System Features A robust governance system is built on three pillars: Submission, Discussion, and Voting. #### 1. Proposal Submission Portal This is the entry point for community ideas. To ensure quality and seriousness, it should include: * **Structured Submission Form:** A standardized form requiring: * **Title:** A clear, concise name for the proposal. * **Abstract/Summary:** A brief overview for voters to quickly understand the core idea. * **Detailed Specification:** A comprehensive breakdown of the proposal, including technical implementation, code (if applicable), timeline, and resources required. * **Motivation:** The "why" behind the proposal—what problem it solves or what opportunity it captures for the ExampleToken ecosystem. * **On-Chain Actions:** A clear definition of what smart contract functions will be called if the proposal passes (e.g., transfer X tokens from treasury to address Y, update a parameter). * **Proposal Fee:** A small fee in **ExampleToken** (e.g., 100 EXM) to prevent spam. This fee can be refunded if the proposal reaches the voting stage, ensuring only serious proposals are submitted. * **Wallet Connection:** Seamless integration with popular wallets (MetaMask, WalletConnect) to verify token ownership for submission. #### 2. Community Discussion & Deliberation Forum Discussion is critical for refining ideas and building consensus *before* a vote. * **Dedicated Forum/Snapshot Space:** Integrate with a platform like **Discourse** or use **Snapshot's discussion feature**. Each submitted proposal should have its own dedicated thread. * **Transparent Identity:** Comments should be linked to the user's wallet address, displaying their **ExampleToken** holdings (optional, can be a range like "Whale," "Dolphin," "Shrimp" to maintain some privacy). * **Moderation & Fact-Checking:** Appoint community moderators or a "Governance Guild" to ensure discussions remain civil, on-topic, and to flag misinformation. * **Proposal Versioning:** Allow the proposal author to edit their submission based on community feedback during a designated "Discussion Period" before it moves to a vote. #### 3. Secure & Transparent Voting Mechanism This is where the final decision is made. * **Token-Weighted Voting:** One EXM token = one vote. This is the standard model, aligning voting power with economic stake in the project. * **Flexible Voting Strategies:** * **Simple Yes/No/Abstain:** For straightforward decisions. * **Ranked-Choice Voting:** For complex proposals with multiple options, allowing voters to express preferences. * **Voting Period:** A fixed, well-publicized timeframe for voting (e.g., 5-7 days) to ensure everyone has a chance to participate. * **Quorum & Thresholds:** * **Quorum:** A minimum percentage of the total circulating supply that must participate for the vote to be valid (e.g., 10% of EXM must be used to vote). Prevents a small, unrepresentative group from making decisions. * **Passing Threshold:** The majority required for a proposal to pass (e.g., >50% for simple majority, >66.7% for critical treasury decisions). * **On-Chain Execution:** Successful proposals should automatically or semi-automatically execute their defined on-chain actions via a Timelock contract, which adds a delay to allow users to react to the decision. --- ### Strategies for Active Participation & Transparency Building the system is only half the battle. You need a strategy to get people to use it. #### 1. To Encourage Participation: * **Educational Resources:** Create "Governance 101" guides, video tutorials, and host regular community calls to explain how the process works. * **Delegate System:** Implement a feature that allows token holders to delegate their voting power to experts or trusted community members. This lowers the barrier to entry for less engaged holders. * **Incentivization:** * **Reward Voters:** Consider a small incentive for participating in votes (e.g., a share of the proposal fees from failed proposals, or a "voter NFT" that grants future perks). * **Bounties for Ideas:** Offer bounties for well-researched and impactful proposals, even if they don't pass, to stimulate high-quality submissions. * **Clear Communication:** Use all your channels (Twitter, Discord, Telegram, project newsletter) to announce when new proposals are open for discussion and voting. #### 2. To Ensure Transparency Throughout the Lifecycle: * **Immutable Record:** All submissions, discussions, and votes should be recorded on-chain or on immutable systems like IPFS (which Snapshot uses). This creates a permanent, tamper-proof record. * **Live Dashboards:** Create a public dashboard showing: * Live voting results. * Voter turnout statistics. * Treasury fund flows before and after a proposal passes. * **Proposal Lifecycle Status:** Clearly label each proposal with its status: `Draft -> In Discussion -> Voting -> Approved/Rejected -> Executed`. * **Timelock Contracts:** As mentioned, using a Timelock contract is crucial. It introduces a mandatory delay (e.g., 48 hours) between a proposal passing and its execution. This is a final transparency check, allowing everyone to see what will happen and giving them time to exit if they strongly disagree. * **Post-Mortem & Reporting:** After a proposal is executed, publish a brief report on its outcomes. Did it achieve its goal? This builds long-term trust and institutional knowledge. ### Recommended Tech Stack * **Discussion & Submission:** Discourse, Commonwealth, or Snapshot's built-in discussion. * **Voting Platform:** **Snapshot** (gas-less, off-chain voting for signaling) is excellent for most decisions. For on-chain, binding votes, a custom solution using **Tally** or **Sybil** for delegation is industry-standard. * **Execution:** Smart contracts on your native chain (e.g., Ethereum, Polygon), often using a framework like **OpenZeppelin Governor**. By implementing these features and strategies, you will build a **ExampleToken** governance system that is not only functional but also legitimate, fostering an active, informed, and empowered community.
error: Generation failed [deepseek] prompt_id=18376 locale=nl err=DeepSeek connection/timeout